Tag Archives: Philip J. Berg

Hate Groups Will Be Gathering at State Capitol, Raleigh, NC Saturday, March 21, 2009

teaparty

White Supremisist, Militia Groups, Traitors and other Conservatives will be gathering in Raleigh, NC at the east side of the Capitol Building on Saturday March 21, 2009. They call it the New American Tea Party but it really just a cover for people that hate the United States governemnt and especially President Obama. These people say they support the Constitution, but they don’t support the electorial process and our current form of government. If they can’t have it they’re way they would rather destroy America and start a violent revolution. The people have spoken and these losers just don’t get it. North Carolina used to be a stronghold of redneck conservatives but the Democrats swept the elections in 2008 and even voted Obama in the Presidential election. If you want some Jerry Springer style entertainment I suggest you attend and bring some adult diapers and baby wipes to hand out to these whiners. God Bless President Obama and the United States of America.

10 Comments

Filed under citizen wells, domestic terror, Hate, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Larry Sinclair, Terrorism, Uncategorized, war on terror

Philip Berg Loses ANOTHER Frivolous Case Against President Obama: Hollister v. Soetoro DEAD

The Hollister v. Soetoro case is DEAD and Philip Berg is in over his head. In the scheme, Berg found a retired Air Force Officer to claim that some day he might be called to duty again. Said officer goes on to say if he was called to duty he wouldn’t be sure if he could serve because he wasn’t positive that President Obama was a natural born citizen and on and on. Judge Robertson saw right through it and wasn’t buying Berg’s BS. This seems to happen to Berg everytime he has to do his job as a lawyer. He seems to be good at filing frivilous cases and raising money on his website but when it comes to the actual day in court, Berg has nothing. But I guess there are enough dumb people to support the lame causes he says he can win.

Looks like its time for Mr. Berg to pay the fiddler. Federal Judge James Robertson called the case “frivolous” , “Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm”, and seemed to direct quite a bit of anger towards Philip Berg. Judge Robertson was very upset by the way Berg has possibly hurt the legal system by filing spurious lawsuits like these. The two documents below are definitely worth a read :

—————————————————————————————————————

March 5th, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY SOETORO, et al.,
Defendants.

:::::::::
Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)

ORDER
Plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader and deposit
funds with the court [#2] is frivolous and is denied. His motion
to shorten time for defendants to respond to his complaint [#3]
is moot and is denied. The motions of his counsel [#4, #5] for
the admission pro hac vice of Philip J. Berg and Lawrence J.
Joyce are in abeyance until the Court has had the opportunity, in
open court, to examine their credentials, their competence, their
good faith, and the factual and legal bases of the complaint they
have signed.

JAMES ROBERTSON
United States District Judge

————————————————————————————————

March 5th, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY SOETORO, et al.,
Defendants.

:::::::::
Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)
MEMORANDUM
This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve
mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is
foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to
do. Even in its relatively short life the case has excited the
blogosphere and the conspiracy theorists. The right thing to do
is to bring it to an early end.
The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force
colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief
(because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is
tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey
orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven — to the
colonel’s satisfaction — that Mr. Obama is a native-born
American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be
President. The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised,
vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by
America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two-year-campaign
for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a
court.
The real plaintiff is probably Philip J. Berg, a lawyer
who lives in Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, and who has pursued
his crusade elsewhere, see Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509
(E.D. Pa. 2008), invoking the civil rights statutes, the Federal
Election Campaign Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the
Immigration and Nationality Act, and the law of promissory
estoppel.
That case was the subject of a scholarly opinion by a
judge who took Mr. Berg’s claims seriously –- and dismissed them.
Mr. Hollister is apparently Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm,
essentially a straw plaintiff
, one who could tee Mr. Berg’s
native-born issue up for decision on a new theory: If some
“value” could be assigned to the “duties” the plaintiff thinks he
might someday be called upon to fulfill under the Commander-in-
Chief, then those “duties” could be deposited in the registry of
this Court as the res whose distribution is to be decided by a
suit in interpleader!
The filing and service of the complaint required
private counsel to appear for President Obama and for Vice
President Biden (whose citizenship is not challenged but who was
presumably considered a necessary party in a suit seeking to
unseat the President). Those counsel have moved to dismiss,
asserting both that this Court has no jurisdiction (Rule
12(b)(1)) and that the plaintiff has stated a claim for which
relief cannot be granted (Rule 12(b)(6)).
Plaintiff having invoked both diversity and the federal
interpleader statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1355, I do have jurisdiction.
Because plaintiff’s only claim invokes the interpleader statute,
however, the suit must be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
I have already called the interpleader claim
“frivolous” in two interlocutory rulings [#10 and #14], and I do
so again here.
As the defendants noted in their motion to
dismiss, “interpleader allows a party exposed to multiple claims
on a single obligation or property to settle the controversy and
satisfy his obligation in one proceeding.” Commercial Union Ins.
Co. v. U.S., 999 F.2d 581, 583 (D.C. Cir. 1993). It is typically
used in insurance cases where the plaintiff holds property on
behalf of another but does not know to whom among several adverse
parties the property should be transferred [#9 at 8]. Resort to
interpleader is inappropriate when it “is sought for improper or
ulterior purposes.”
Wright & Miller § 1707 (3d ed. 2001).
Plaintiff has not cited a single case that lends even
colorable support to the notion that his alleged “duties” can be
the “money or property” to which the interpleader statute
applies. The interpleader suits he cites are all about money or
tangible property: American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v.
Construcciones Werl, Inc., 407 F. Supp 164 (D. V.I. 1975) is
about contested HUD monies; Underwriters at Lloyd’s v. Nichols,
363 F.2d 357 (8th Cir. 1966), is about insurance proceeds; Dunbar
v. United States, 502 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1974) is about money
seized from the mails. The only interpleader case plaintiff
cites that involves a “duty” is Bank of Neosho v. Colcord, 8
F.R.D. 621 (W.D. Mo. 1949) (Complaint, para. 12), an inapposite
decision declining to strike a cross-claim for specific
performance in an interpleader case that began, as interpleader
cases do, with the deposit of funds. This suit will accordingly
be dismissed.
Mr. Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce, an attorney who lives
in Tucson, Arizona, signed the complaint in this case.
(They
have been filing electronically although they have not been
admitted pro hac vice, see [#10].) They are agents
provocateurs –- and any attempt to sanction them for misuse of
the public and private resources that have had to be devoted to
this case would only give them a forum to continue their
provocation.
John D. Hemenway, on the other hand, is a member of
the Bar of this Court. He may have been enlisted by Messrs. Berg
and Joyce as a foot soldier in their crusade, but he is
nevertheless directly responsible to this Court for the pleadings
that have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Because it
appears that the complaint in this case may have been presented
for an improper purpose such as to harass; and that the
interpleader claims and other legal contentions of plaintiff are
not warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous arguments for
extending, modifying or reversing existing law or for
establishing new law, the accompanying order of dismissal
requires Mr. Hemenway to show cause why he has not violated Rules
11(b)(1) and 11(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
and why he should not be required to pay reasonable attorneys
fees and other expenses to counsel for the defendants.

JAMES ROBERTSON
United States District Judge

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama

Alan Keyes Case Against President Obama Dismissed

alankeyestrash1

Looks like Alan Keyes and the Constitution Party has joined the ranks of people like Philip Berg by filing spurious and unsuccessful cases against President Obama.  Alan Keyes is also trying to gain notoriety by filing a lawsuit questioning the Barack Obama birth certificate and the birthplace of President Obama. This type of case has already been taken to the US Supreme Court who summarily refused to have anything to do with it. It’s a shame that another alleged conservative has chosen the route of conspiracy theories instead of coming up real solutions to America’s problems. But since Alan Keyes is a supporter of lobbyists, the rich, and corporations that send our jobs overseas what can you expect ? Alan Keyes really does have nothing to offer so why not play smoke and mirrors and hope some nimrods keep sending you checks ? Keyes v. Lingle dismissed by the Hawaii Supreme Court as expected. Its time to stop playing politics and do something that brings our America together.

NO. 29473

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I


CONSTITUTION PARTY; ALAN L. KEYES, Plaintiffs,

vs.

LINDA LINGLE in her official capacity as Governor of the
State of Hawai‘i; KEVIN B. CRONIN in his official capacity as
the Chief Election Officer for the State of Hawai‘i; JOHN
DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50; DOE
CORPORATIONS 1-50; AND DOE ENTITIES 1-50, Defendants.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


ORDER OF DISMISSAL
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Complaint to Contest the 2008 Presidential Election submitted by Plaintiffs Constitution Party and Alan L. Keyes, the Motion to Dismiss submitted by Defendants Governor Linda L. Lingle and Chief Election Officer Kevin B. Cronin, it appears the Plaintiffs style the complaint as an election contest brought pursuant to Hawaii‘i Revised Statutes §§ 11-172 and 11-174.5, but allege, in pertinent part, that Defendant Cronin failed to require proof that candidate Barack Obama was qualified to be a candidate for President of the United States. Any challenge to the Chief Election Officer’s finding of eligibility of a presidential candidate in the State of Hawai‘i must be pursued in accordance with HRS § 11-113(e), not sections 11-172 and 11-174.5. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is granted and this case is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, December 5, 2008.

Leave a comment

Filed under Hate, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Philip J. Berg, Uncategorized

The Philip J. Berg that Citizen Wells Doesn’t Want To Blog About

Citizen Wells is happy to post about the spurious lawsuits that Hillary Clinton supporter and Attorney Philip J. Berg has filed against President Obama claiming he is not a US Citizen. But as you know if you visit Wells blog you know you don’t always get the whole story.  Here is a video in Philip J. Berg’s own words about another spurious lawsuit filed by Berg claiming that the 911 attack on the World Trade Center were planned and executed by the Bush Administration. Berg actually filed this suit and of course couldn’t prove anything and of course the case was thrown out. This video is in Philip J. Berg’s own words so there will be no mistake of the nature of Mr. Berg. This is the side of Philip Berg that Citizen Wells doesn’t report because in my opinion would probably severly damage any credibility he needs for people to keep the donations rolling in to his blog. I have also never read anything on Citizen Wells blog about the $10,000 ethics fine and requirement that Berg get ethics training for the way he handled another case in his state. I can’t stand to see people misgided and manipulated by people that call themselves journalists and don’t give you the whole story.

Leave a comment

Filed under Hate, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Philip J. Berg

Philip J. Berg The Lawyer: His Conspiracy Theories About Obama, Bush, The 911 Attack, And His Website Asking for Money to Support Him

Philip Berg the Lawyer has filed claims in our court system that President Obama is not qualified to be our President. Mr. Bergs claims have been thrown out of court one by one. This doesn’t seem to bother Mr. Berg. Philip Berg is still asking for money from people to support his spurious claims. I find it alarming that Mr. Berg is able to file lawsuits that contain no evidence other than hearsay. It seems like a blatant attempt to make more claims and attempt to collect more money. It seems to me that Mr. Berg is taking advantage of our legal system by filing useless lawsuits and wasting the taxpayers time and money to answer these ridiculous lawsuits. Also alarming is that I couldn’t find any documents on Mr. Berg’s website Obamacrimes.com showing when and why his cases were thrown out. Here is an important one I found myself at the US Supreme Court Website.

No. 08-570
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008 Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008 Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
Jan 12 2009 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED.
Jan 12 2009 Petition DENIED.
Jan 21 2009 Application (08A505) denied by the Court.

Philip Berg the Lawyer seems to have a history of making strange claims.  In 2007 Philip Berg filed a RICO suit against President Bush and Dick Cheney claiming they were the architects of the 911 attack on the World Trade Center and asked that they both be arrested and tried for global crimes and punished accordingly. He also claimed that the 911 attacks were a plan for global dominance and even claimed President Bush’s brother Jeb was involved according to thus story posted on RINF.COM.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO STORY ON RINF.COM

When you look into Philip Berg’s past there are things that make you pause for a moment. I found a story about Berg being slapped with $10,000 in sanctions and ordered to complete 6 hours of ethics training. A couple quotes from the 10 page finding against Attorney Berg Jump right out at you when you look at some of the cases Mr. Berg has filed.  US District Judge J. Curtis Joyner had these things to say according to the story posted on Law.com:

“Other attorneys should look to Mr. Berg’s actions as a blueprint for what not to do when attempting to effectively and honorably perform the duties of the legal profession,”

Joyner blasted Berg for filing the fraud claim, calling it an “irresponsible decision” because the claim was “utterly barren of any scintilla of legal principles.”

Berg had no standing to bring suit against Carpenters Health and had “failed to conduct even a minimally reasonable inquiry before filing his complaint.”

“filing a complaint completely devoid of any basis in fact or law, as would be apparent to any reasonable attorney after the slightest inquiry.”

CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE LAW.COM STORY

CLICK HERE TO GO TO HOLSWORTH V. PHILIP J. BERG, ESQ

CLICK HERE TO GO A LINK TO BERG’S WEBSITE SAYING THERE IS AN URGENT NEED FOR MONEY

Leave a comment

Filed under Philip J. Berg, Uncategorized

Some Court Documents You May Have Trouble Finding On Anti Barack Obama Attorney, 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist, Bush Rico and Proponent of Disbarring Members of the Supreme Court Philip J Berg’s Website

Document 1
No. 08-570
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by respondent Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) DENIED by Justice Souter.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.

Lawrence J. Joyce Lawrence J. Joyce LLC (520) 584-0236
1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215
Tucson, AZ 85712
barmemberlj@earthlink.net
Party name: Bill Anderson
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
——————————————————————————————————-
Document 2
No. 08A391
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) DENIED by Justice Souter.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a391.htm
—————————————————————————————————
Document 3
No. 08A505
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) DENIED by Justice Souter.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.

Lawrence J. Joyce Lawrence J. Joyce LLC (520) 584-0236
1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215
Tucson, AZ 85712
Party name: Bill Anderson
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a505.htm
Link to US Supreme Court

Document 4
Obama Campaigns answer when he tried to shut down the November 4th election

2 Comments

Filed under Hate, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Philip J. Berg, Talk Radio, WBT

Who is Anti Barack Obama Attorney Philip J. Berg ? Parts 1 and 2 , His 9/11 Conspiracy Theories, Bush Rico Lawsuits, Disbarring the Supreme Court aka Spurious Legal Cases

Here is an interesting history of some of Philip J. Berg’s politically driven spurious lawsuits.

Here’s more about Berg:

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 01/04/07) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire,
[Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former
candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate; an attorney with offices in
Montgomery County, PA and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA, who
prior hereto has filed a RICO lawsuit against Bush and others for the
events of 9/11 and plans to re-file shortly] announced today that he
was issuing a call for world leaders to arrest and try Bush and Cheney
for the global crimes of 9/11/01.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in a letter to the nations throughout
the world:

“It is time for the nations of the world to come forth and take the
leadership because of the failure of the United States Government and
the States where crimes were committed on 09/11/01, where no thorough
investigation and indictments occurred, to investigate, arrest and
prosecute the people responsible for the murders on 9/11/01,
specifically including George W. Bush and Richard Cheney.”

Berg sounds quite confident there, but when it comes to specifics, he
vacillates a bit:

Berg continued there is overwhelming evidence that:

“Bush and his cronies made 9/11 happen or let it happen. And, if they
let it happen, then they made it happen. Either way, they are
responsible; and more important, they have completely and
unequivocally covered-it-up!”

Berg continues:

” Now, it is time for world leaders to take the lesson learned from
Iraq and issue a warrant for the arrest of George W. Bush and Richard
Cheney; arrest them; take them to a neutral country; try them for the
murder of over 2,800 people from more than 80 countries on 9/11/01
and, when found guilty, sentence them appropriately. Jurisdiction
would be proper in any of the more than 80 countries whose citizens
were murdered on 9/11. “

Yeah, just arrest them!

Berg’s a nutbar Bush-hater from way back; in 2001 he asked Supreme
Court Justices Thomas, Scalia and O’Connor to voluntarily disbar
themselves for their decision in Bush v. Gore. He also sued President
Bush in 2004 under a RICO lawsuit on behalf of Willie Rodriguez.

Berg is the nutball attorney who sued President-elect Obama, claiming
that Obama was sired by the great racehorse Secretariat and a
Norwegian mare. Here’s more about Berg:

http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/philip-berg-seeking-the-truth-of-911

Philip J. Berg, Esq. Seeking the “Truth of 9/11″
Calls on World Community To Arrest and Try Bush & Cheney for Global
Crimes of 9/11
Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Philip J. Berg, Esquire, [Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of
Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate; an
attorney with offices in Montgomery County, PA and an active practice
in Philadelphia, PA, who prior hereto has filed a RICO lawsuit against
Bush and others for the events of 9/11 and plans to re-file shortly]
announced today that he was issuing a call for world leaders to arrest
and try Bush and Cheney for the global crimes of 9/11/01.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in a letter to the nations throughout
the world:

“It is time for the nations of the world to come forth and take the
leadership because of the failure of the United States Government and
the States where crimes were committed on 09/11/01, where no thorough
investigation and indictments occurred, to investigate, arrest and
prosecute the people responsible for the murders on 9/11/01,
specifically including George W. Bush and Richard Cheney. ”

Berg continued there is overwhelming evidence that:

“Bush and his cronies made 9/11 happen or let it happen. And, if they
let it happen, then they made it happen. Either way, they are
responsible; and more important, they have completely and
unequivocally covered-it-up!”

Berg’s letter went on to say:

“The trial and execution of Saddam Hussein marks the “end of a
difficult year for the Iraqi people and for our troops” according to
President Bush.

Now, it is time for world leaders to take the lesson learned from Iraq
and issue a warrant for the arrest of George W. Bush and Richard
Cheney; arrest them; take them to a neutral country; try them for the
murder of over 2,800 people from more than 80 countries on 9/11/01
and, when found guilty, sentence them appropriately. Jurisdiction
would be proper in any of the more than 80 countries whose citizens
were murdered on 9/11.

Despite a near-complete corporate media embargo on the wealth of
evidence indicating that the 9/11 attacks were caused or knowingly
permitted to happen by top figures in the Administration and the
military, 84 % of the U.S. public, according to an October 2006 CBS/NY
Times poll, is unconvinced by the “Official Story,” and agrees that
the President and others caused or allowed the attacks to happen.

That an event such as 9/11 was desired by powerful Administration
figures, including Cheney and Jeb Bush, the President’s brother, is a
matter of record, as the Project for the New American Century’s [PNAC]
blueprint for worldwide U.S. dominance entitled “Rebuilding America’s
Defenses,” stated that the program they advocated could win popular
support only with the help of a “catastrophic and catalyzing event,
like a new Pearl Harbor” which (we are supposed to believe to be
coincidence) came to pass just 8 months after many of the co-signers
of the PNAC document assumed high positions in the new Bush
Administration in January 2001.

As President John F. Kennedy stated, “Things do not just happen; they
are made to happen.” There has never been an investigation of 9/11
that had not concluded, before it even began, that the Official Story
convicting Osama bin Laden and absolving the Administration and the
military of complicity of anything worse than “intelligence failures,”
which thereby made the outcome a foregone conclusion.

It is time that the men who had the motive, means and the opportunity
to commit the terrible crimes of 9/11, and who have profited by it
politically as well as financially, be exposed for their role and held
to account.

The world has suffered since the horrific acts of Bush and his cronies
on 9/11, that being the events of 9/11 and the aftermath, the illegal
act of war against Afghanistan and Iraq that has caused the death and
injury of hundreds of thousands, including thousands of U.S. troops;
the destruction of property and the enormous costs involved.

Saddam was tried, found guilty and sentenced to death after being
convicted of murder in the killings of 148 Shiite Muslims from an
Iraqi town where assassins tried to kill him in 1982. This number of
killings that Saddam Hussein was found guilty of is far less than Bush
and his cronies caused to die on 9/11.

The 148 Iraqi deaths for which Saddam was tried pales in number to the
750,000 dead at the hands of George W. Bush as a result of this
illegal invasion of that country which includes babies, sons,
daughters, mothers, fathers, elderly grandmothers and grandfathers,
killed without remorse by George W. Bush and his war profiteering
supporters.

Bush continues the war in Iraq to keep the world’s attention there and
not on the atrocities caused by him on 9/11, including the possibility
of Bush sending up to 40,000 more troops to Iraq, even though a
majority of the American people are against this increase.

The world must act now because our own government has failed us. We
cannot relent until real justice is reached. Only by exposing the
truth of 9/11 and revealing how it was used as the “trigger event” to
justify the neocon’s imperial policy can we put these events in proper
prospective.”

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.politics/2008-11/msg01915.html
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.politics/2008-11/msg01914.html

2 Comments

Filed under Hate, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Philip J. Berg, Terrorism, Uncategorized, war on terror, WBT

Anti Barack Obama attorney Philip J. Berg faces disciplinary complaint

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

INTERNET POWERHOUSE ANDY MARTIN ASKS PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY BOARD TO EXAMINE ATTORNEY PHILIP BERG’S PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

(NEW YORK)(November 12, 2008) Andy Martin has asked the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board to investigate
the conduct of anti-Obama attorney Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, PA. “There have been a lot of questions, and criticism, swirling around Mr. Berg’s behavior,” Martin stated. “I thought his behavior merited a look by the Disciplinary Board. That way there can be a fair and impartial examination of his claims and actions.”

A copy of Martin’s Statement, which is part of Martin’s form complaint, (faxed to the DB today, November 12th) follows:

November 12, 2008

Philip J. Berg contacted me in mid-August about a complaint he proposed to file in federal court. He sent me the complaint to review, and I advised him the complaint was nonsense. He was suing the wrong parties in the wrong court for the wrong relief. Berg said he wanted to “enjoin the Democratic National Convention,” which caused me to question his sanity. He pleaded that Barack Obama was “born in Kenya” when there is not a shred of credible evidence to support this claim.

He filed his complaint and then began issuing a series of asinine news releases about the progress of his lawsuit.

Berg is playing on the vulnerability of people who intensely dislike President-elect Barack Obama, and using his inflated accusations to solicit money from the public. He constantly exaggerates or misrepresents the facts. In early September persons acting on his behalf claimed there was a “court order” for Obama to produce a birth certificate. No such order existed.

Then he claimed Obama was in “default” and had “admitted” he was born in Kenya. This was compete nonsense. As someone who is a genuine critic of Mr. Obama, I know firsthand what confusion Berg creates with his false and misleading claims. Most recently he or persons acting in concert with him have suggested that the U.S. Supreme Court “ordered” a response to his nonsense. The Court has done nothing of the sort. The court’s rules simply provide a thirty-day period for responses.

I don’t know whether Berg suffers from an emotional disturbance, or is merely a money-grubbing huckster, or what, but Berg’s behavior is undermining public faith in the integrity of the Pennsylvania legal profession.

Berg has been disciplined in the past for misconduct:

systocracy.com/Bergmalpracticetwo

www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/05D0679P.pdf
www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/05d0521p.pdf

Lawyers are entitled to engage in vigorous advocacy. They are encouraged to extend and revise legal precedents. But they are not entitled to file delusional claims without a scintilla of support, particularly when they then use these delusional claims as a basis to solicit money from the public.

Mr. Berg has previously claimed that the U.S. Government blew up the World Trade Center, again without shred of evidence to support his nonsense.

He is a threat to vulnerable citizens who tend to believe his false claims and give him money on the false assumption that Berg is acting in good faith. By stealing small amounts of money from people across the nation he has flown under the radar of professional discipline. No competent attorney could have acted as Berg did during the past three months. His behavior in federal court, all of which is a public record, is outrageous.
-
A copy of Martin’s complaint is available by fax (not e-mail)
-
Andy Martin is a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of broadcasting experience in radio and television. He is currently based in New York selling his new book, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of http://www.ContrarianCommentary.com. © Copyright by Andy Martin 2008. Martin comments on regional, national and world events with over forty years of experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree
from the University of Illinois College of Law.

His columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Andy is the author of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, published in July 2008, see http://www.OrangeStatePress.com.

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329
E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com [NOTE: We frequently correct typographical errors and additions/subtractions on our blogs, where you can find the latest edition of this release.]

11 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Election 2008, Hate, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Uncategorized, WBT

US Supreme Court Dismisses Barack Obama Birth Certificate Case

equal_justice
In a move that will upset conspiracy theorists, UFO proponents, and racists throughout the country, the US Supreme Court has dismissed the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Case. This case was brought as an emergency by a crackpot from New Jersey who was trying to make the case that because Barack Obama’s Father was a British Citizen, Barack wasn’t a “Natural Born Citizen”. There was no definition given for a natural born citizen in the US Constitution. So in 1795, that’s right 1795 our forefathers decided they would clear this up and passed the Naturalization Act of 1975. Many of the forefathers that were at the Constitution Convention were involved in the crafting and the passing of this legislation of Title 8 of the U.S. Code filling in the gaps of US Citizenship. Its sad that a politically motivated case like this can actually be brought to our court system but it proves the court is accessible to everybody, even wackos. So for future reference, this is who qualities as a citizen:

Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?

The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

* Anyone born inside the United States
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

Information on Citizenship
Chicago Tribune story on the Obama Birth Certificate Case

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Judge Dismisses Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuit

Yes, Philip J. Berg is a Crackpot. Maybe he’ll try and sue the Pope next.

Judge rejects Montco lawyer’s bid to have Obama removed from ballot
By MICHAEL HINKELMAN
Philadelphia Daily News
hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656
A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.
Philip J. Berg alleged in a complaint filed in federal district court on Aug. 21 against Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.
Berg claimed that the Democratic presidential standardbearer is not even an American citizen but a citizen of Indonesia and therefore ineligible to be president.
He alleged that if Obama was permitted to run for president and subsequently found to be ineligible, he and other voters would be disenfranchised.
U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday.
Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.
They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.
Surrick agreed.
In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters.
Surrick ruled that Berg’s attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were “frivolous and not worthy of discussion.”
The judge also said the harm Berg alleged did “not constitute an injury in fact” and Berg’s arguments to the contrary “ventured into the unreasonable.”
For example, Berg had claimed that Obama’s nomination deprived citizens of voting for Sen. Hillary Clinton in November. (Berg backed Clinton in the primaries.)
Berg could not be reached for comment last night.
Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, and the campaign posted a document issued by Hawaii on its Web site, fight thesmears.com, confirming his birth there.
Berg said in court papers that the image was a forgery.
The nonpartisan Web site FactCheck.org examined the original document and said it was legitimate.
Further, a birth announcement in the Aug. 13, 1961, Honolulu Advertiser listed Obama’s birth there on Aug. 4. *

From Philly.com at: LINK TO FULL ARTICLE

LINK TO BARACK OBAMA”S BIRTH CERTIFICATE

3 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama