As predicted, convicted felon Larry Sinclair has not delivered the book of lies about President Obama he promised by the end of April. Larry claims he performed sexual acts on President Obama and snorted coke. He failed a polygraph test on the subject and has no witness’s, phone records or credit card receipts that back up his claims. People have been ordering a book about the subject promised by Larry for months. Larry has been taking the money and has not delivered the merchandise as promised. Every week or so Larry has made a excuse ranging from brain tumors, and toothaches to various Obama conspiracies. Larry is now saying the book will not be available until June 1st. But I know it won’t be and he will still be taking orders. Where is all the money he took for the books he didn’t deliver ?
Tag Archives: Video
Its May 1st, 2009 and Convicted Felon and Anti Obama Crook Larry Sinclair Has Not Delivered the Books Sold On His Website.
I saw this new post on youtube featuring Larry Sinclair. Hilarious
It looks like time is running out on Larry Sinclair’s 15 minutes of fame. Months of promising a book about his alleged sexual conduct and drug use with President Obama have not materialized. I have been tracking the progress of this alleged book for several months now and am personally convinced that Larry Sinclair has no book to offer. Mr. Sinclair has offered a multitude of reasons why the book was not actually published and available on many dates. These reasons usually involve an illness or some strange conspiracy theory. Larry Sinclair’s felonious past and history of fraud not withstanding I would have to guess that this was a way for Mr. Sinclair to gain attention or possibly bilk people out of money. He actually offered 200 special edition, signed copies of the book months ago and has been taking advanced orders through his website for some time. The sad thing is that he has never published the book. It also seems even close friends like blogger Citizen Wells are trying to distance themselves from him. It looks like Mr. Sinclair may be in some hot water.
I found this interveiw between Citizen Wells friend Anti Obama Felon Larry Sinclair and radio hosts Opie and Anthony on Youtube. WARNING: Very Graphic Language
As predicted Larry Sinclair’s blockbuster book about President Obama is NOT available on April 1st, . This is no surprise. Convicted Felon Larry Sinclair seems to have a problem keeping his promises. At this point I doubt a book even exists. I think it may well worth investigating what has been done with the money Larry Sinclair has been taking for advance orders over the past MONTHS
The Hollister v. Soetoro case is DEAD and Philip Berg is in over his head. In the scheme, Berg found a retired Air Force Officer to claim that some day he might be called to duty again. Said officer goes on to say if he was called to duty he wouldn’t be sure if he could serve because he wasn’t positive that President Obama was a natural born citizen and on and on. Judge Robertson saw right through it and wasn’t buying Berg’s BS. This seems to happen to Berg everytime he has to do his job as a lawyer. He seems to be good at filing frivilous cases and raising money on his website but when it comes to the actual day in court, Berg has nothing. But I guess there are enough dumb people to support the lame causes he says he can win.
Looks like its time for Mr. Berg to pay the fiddler. Federal Judge James Robertson called the case “frivolous” , “Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm”, and seemed to direct quite a bit of anger towards Philip Berg. Judge Robertson was very upset by the way Berg has possibly hurt the legal system by filing spurious lawsuits like these. The two documents below are definitely worth a read :
March 5th, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
BARRY SOETORO, et al.,
Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)
Plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader and deposit
funds with the court [#2] is frivolous and is denied. His motion
to shorten time for defendants to respond to his complaint [#3]
is moot and is denied. The motions of his counsel [#4, #5] for
the admission pro hac vice of Philip J. Berg and Lawrence J.
Joyce are in abeyance until the Court has had the opportunity, in
open court, to examine their credentials, their competence, their
good faith, and the factual and legal bases of the complaint they
United States District Judge
March 5th, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
BARRY SOETORO, et al.,
Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)
This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve
mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is
foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to
do. Even in its relatively short life the case has excited the
blogosphere and the conspiracy theorists. The right thing to do
is to bring it to an early end.
The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force
colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief
(because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is
tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey
orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven — to the
colonel’s satisfaction — that Mr. Obama is a native-born
American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be
President. The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised,
vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by
America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two-year-campaign
for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a
The real plaintiff is probably Philip J. Berg, a lawyer
who lives in Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, and who has pursued
his crusade elsewhere, see Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509
(E.D. Pa. 2008), invoking the civil rights statutes, the Federal
Election Campaign Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the
Immigration and Nationality Act, and the law of promissory
estoppel. That case was the subject of a scholarly opinion by a
judge who took Mr. Berg’s claims seriously –- and dismissed them.
Mr. Hollister is apparently Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm,
essentially a straw plaintiff, one who could tee Mr. Berg’s
native-born issue up for decision on a new theory: If some
“value” could be assigned to the “duties” the plaintiff thinks he
might someday be called upon to fulfill under the Commander-in-
Chief, then those “duties” could be deposited in the registry of
this Court as the res whose distribution is to be decided by a
suit in interpleader!
The filing and service of the complaint required
private counsel to appear for President Obama and for Vice
President Biden (whose citizenship is not challenged but who was
presumably considered a necessary party in a suit seeking to
unseat the President). Those counsel have moved to dismiss,
asserting both that this Court has no jurisdiction (Rule
12(b)(1)) and that the plaintiff has stated a claim for which
relief cannot be granted (Rule 12(b)(6)).
Plaintiff having invoked both diversity and the federal
interpleader statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1355, I do have jurisdiction.
Because plaintiff’s only claim invokes the interpleader statute,
however, the suit must be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
I have already called the interpleader claim
“frivolous” in two interlocutory rulings [#10 and #14], and I do
so again here. As the defendants noted in their motion to
dismiss, “interpleader allows a party exposed to multiple claims
on a single obligation or property to settle the controversy and
satisfy his obligation in one proceeding.” Commercial Union Ins.
Co. v. U.S., 999 F.2d 581, 583 (D.C. Cir. 1993). It is typically
used in insurance cases where the plaintiff holds property on
behalf of another but does not know to whom among several adverse
parties the property should be transferred [#9 at 8]. Resort to
interpleader is inappropriate when it “is sought for improper or
ulterior purposes.” Wright & Miller § 1707 (3d ed. 2001).
Plaintiff has not cited a single case that lends even
colorable support to the notion that his alleged “duties” can be
the “money or property” to which the interpleader statute
applies. The interpleader suits he cites are all about money or
tangible property: American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v.
Construcciones Werl, Inc., 407 F. Supp 164 (D. V.I. 1975) is
about contested HUD monies; Underwriters at Lloyd’s v. Nichols,
363 F.2d 357 (8th Cir. 1966), is about insurance proceeds; Dunbar
v. United States, 502 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1974) is about money
seized from the mails. The only interpleader case plaintiff
cites that involves a “duty” is Bank of Neosho v. Colcord, 8
F.R.D. 621 (W.D. Mo. 1949) (Complaint, para. 12), an inapposite
decision declining to strike a cross-claim for specific
performance in an interpleader case that began, as interpleader
cases do, with the deposit of funds. This suit will accordingly
Mr. Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce, an attorney who lives
in Tucson, Arizona, signed the complaint in this case. (They
have been filing electronically although they have not been
admitted pro hac vice, see [#10].) They are agents
provocateurs –- and any attempt to sanction them for misuse of
the public and private resources that have had to be devoted to
this case would only give them a forum to continue their
provocation. John D. Hemenway, on the other hand, is a member of
the Bar of this Court. He may have been enlisted by Messrs. Berg
and Joyce as a foot soldier in their crusade, but he is
nevertheless directly responsible to this Court for the pleadings
that have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Because it
appears that the complaint in this case may have been presented
for an improper purpose such as to harass; and that the
interpleader claims and other legal contentions of plaintiff are
not warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous arguments for
extending, modifying or reversing existing law or for
establishing new law, the accompanying order of dismissal
requires Mr. Hemenway to show cause why he has not violated Rules
11(b)(1) and 11(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
and why he should not be required to pay reasonable attorneys
fees and other expenses to counsel for the defendants.
United States District Judge
Larry Sinclair is a regular poster on Citizen Wells blog. Citizen Wells has even met personally with Larry Sinclair. Who is this mysterious friend of Citizen Wells ? Well first off Larry Sinclair has claimed he provided oral sex to Barack Obama. He also claimed he did Cocaine with Barack Obama. Since Citizen Wells claims to be all about truth and justice I thought I might just post some things I found out his close friend and associate he has failed to mention to his readers.
Here is what conservatives have to say about Larry Sinclair:
“Initially, we gave Sinclair and his claims a fair hearing. But, when someone brings serious accusations against a presidential candidate–and we can muster little enthusiasm for any of Obama’s stands on the issues–the burden of proof falls on the accuser. Sinclair, 4 months and counting after since the release of his YouTube video detailing his initial accusations, has come up empty in the Proof Department.”
Please feel free to post your thoughts on this Blog.
Citizen Wells has posted another blog calling for a violent uprising by the military and the people against our democratically elected government. This “Citizen Well” as he calls himself posted a video of an x-marine calling himself a patriot but condones the military taking over our country by force. Citizen Wells is an avid Obama hater but sometimes you can take things too far. Citizen Well’s of North Carolina is also posting lies on his site. His site says that that the oath the military takes is:
“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic;”
When the actual oath is this:
“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
Do you notice how Citizen Wells leaves out the part about obeying the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the Officers appointed over me ? To dislike a President is one thing, but calling for the overthrow of the government is another. Again, Citizen Wells shows how hateful and dangerous he really is. Domestic Terrorists like Citizen Wells are no laughing matter and should be dealt with swiftly.
**** U P D A T E *****U P D A T E *****U P D A T E *****U P D A T E ****
It looks like Citizen Wells reads this blog. This is a comment on his blog only minutes after I posted my story about him. Here was his post:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
INTERNET POWERHOUSE ANDY MARTIN ASKS PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY BOARD TO EXAMINE ATTORNEY PHILIP BERG’S PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
(NEW YORK)(November 12, 2008) Andy Martin has asked the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board to investigate
the conduct of anti-Obama attorney Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, PA. “There have been a lot of questions, and criticism, swirling around Mr. Berg’s behavior,” Martin stated. “I thought his behavior merited a look by the Disciplinary Board. That way there can be a fair and impartial examination of his claims and actions.”
A copy of Martin’s Statement, which is part of Martin’s form complaint, (faxed to the DB today, November 12th) follows:
November 12, 2008
Philip J. Berg contacted me in mid-August about a complaint he proposed to file in federal court. He sent me the complaint to review, and I advised him the complaint was nonsense. He was suing the wrong parties in the wrong court for the wrong relief. Berg said he wanted to “enjoin the Democratic National Convention,” which caused me to question his sanity. He pleaded that Barack Obama was “born in Kenya” when there is not a shred of credible evidence to support this claim.
He filed his complaint and then began issuing a series of asinine news releases about the progress of his lawsuit.
Berg is playing on the vulnerability of people who intensely dislike President-elect Barack Obama, and using his inflated accusations to solicit money from the public. He constantly exaggerates or misrepresents the facts. In early September persons acting on his behalf claimed there was a “court order” for Obama to produce a birth certificate. No such order existed.
Then he claimed Obama was in “default” and had “admitted” he was born in Kenya. This was compete nonsense. As someone who is a genuine critic of Mr. Obama, I know firsthand what confusion Berg creates with his false and misleading claims. Most recently he or persons acting in concert with him have suggested that the U.S. Supreme Court “ordered” a response to his nonsense. The Court has done nothing of the sort. The court’s rules simply provide a thirty-day period for responses.
I don’t know whether Berg suffers from an emotional disturbance, or is merely a money-grubbing huckster, or what, but Berg’s behavior is undermining public faith in the integrity of the Pennsylvania legal profession.
Berg has been disciplined in the past for misconduct:
Lawyers are entitled to engage in vigorous advocacy. They are encouraged to extend and revise legal precedents. But they are not entitled to file delusional claims without a scintilla of support, particularly when they then use these delusional claims as a basis to solicit money from the public.
Mr. Berg has previously claimed that the U.S. Government blew up the World Trade Center, again without shred of evidence to support his nonsense.
He is a threat to vulnerable citizens who tend to believe his false claims and give him money on the false assumption that Berg is acting in good faith. By stealing small amounts of money from people across the nation he has flown under the radar of professional discipline. No competent attorney could have acted as Berg did during the past three months. His behavior in federal court, all of which is a public record, is outrageous.
A copy of Martin’s complaint is available by fax (not e-mail)
Andy Martin is a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of broadcasting experience in radio and television. He is currently based in New York selling his new book, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of http://www.ContrarianCommentary.com. © Copyright by Andy Martin 2008. Martin comments on regional, national and world events with over forty years of experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree
from the University of Illinois College of Law.
His columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Andy is the author of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, published in July 2008, see http://www.OrangeStatePress.com.
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329
E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com [NOTE: We frequently correct typographical errors and additions/subtractions on our blogs, where you can find the latest edition of this release.]