WBT-1110 and Tara Servatius Spreading More Hate and Lies About the Muslim Community

Today, I listened to Tara go on and on about the Mosque “AT” ground Zero. But as usual she wasn’t telling truth. There is NO Mosque at Ground Zero. And if you read below you will find out the truth about what many sick people have been trying to perpetrate against the American people. I don’t think it serves in the best interest of the community to allow someone with Tara’s extremist views to represent Charlotte. She has an agenda of hate against the poor, black people, gay people, immigrants and Muslims. Tara calls herself a journalist but often blatantly lies to promote her brand of hate. Tara’s so-called Mosque is a community center and it is NOT at the Ground Zero site as she would have you believe. Sadly enough I have made staff at WBT-1110 aware of this and they don’t seem to care. Tara Servatius and WBT-1110 are guilty of inciting hatred against people they don’t even know. Below is the truth about the location of what she calls the Mosque “AT” Ground Zero.

From the Huffington Post:

From 45 Park Place, the former Burlington Coat Factory building that will make way for the Cordoba House, it’s two blocks, around a corner, to get to the WTC site. Park Place doesn’t lie between the construction site and any mass transit stations, so you would need to go out of your way to have it offend you.

If you look up the walking directions you’ll notice that it takes a couple of minutes to walk the distance (approximately a tenth of a mile) between the two spots. Pretty much two minutes exactly when I took the trip with a shaky video camera.

When the new World Trade Center rises, you’ll be able to see it from 45 Park Place, because it’ll be by far the tallest thing around. The planned Cordoba House will be dwarfed. It certainly won’t overlook or overshadow Ground Zero.

Why is the distance between the two sites so important? Simple accuracy, for one. It’s frustrating to see so many commentators blithely disregard an obvious, physical problem with the “mosque at Ground Zero” formulation: it’s not at Ground Zero.

Clyde Haberman of the New York Times further explains the significance:

There’s that “at.” For a two-letter word, it packs quite a wallop. It has been tossed around in a manner both cavalier and disingenuous, with an intention by some to inflame passions. Nobody, regardless of political leanings, would tolerate a mosque at ground zero. “Near” is not the same, as anyone who paid attention back in the fourth grade should know.

I understand the journalist’s impulse to use the “Ground Zero Mosque” shorthand to instantly remind readers why they should care about the story. Headlines leave out qualifiers like “near” all the time for brevity’s sake. But in this case the elision is critical; leaving out the “near” clearly takes sides — against the “mosque” and against accuracy.

In addition, the building planned for 45 Park Place is a cultural center with a prayer room — not a single-purpose house of worship for Muslims, which is probably what we should reserve the word “mosque” for. As Haberman also explains, “That it may even be called a mosque is debatable. It is designed as a multi-use complex with a space set aside for prayer — no minarets, no muezzin calls to prayer blaring onto Park Place.”

The 92nd Street Y, on which the Cordoba House is explicitly modeled, has a whole host of Jewish events take place inside of it, but no one calls it a synagogue. There’s no good reason why Cordoba House should be misleadingly called a “mosque.” I’ve been guilty of using this word too, in conversation and in writing, but it’s inaccurate. Muslims already read the Quran and pray at 45 Park Place, but that does not and will not turn it into a “mosque.”

There’s one more catch for the opponents of the so-called Ground Zero mosque: by the same logical leap you can call the Cordoba Center a “mosque,” you can also call Ground Zero as it already exists a giant, open-air mosque. Muslim prayers are already taking place right on the edge of the construction site, and not for world domination. Families are going there to pray — for the souls of the dozens of innocent Muslim victims who died on September 11.

The Original Huffington Post Article

A White Supremacist Hate Group that Tara Servatius has been linked too.

Tara Servatius Hating Gay People For Kicks and Ratings at WBT-1110

Replace “Wrong Way” Joe Wilson with War Veteran and Marine Officer Rob Miller

Poll: Joe Wilson trailing Democratic rival

 

A newly-released poll shows Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C) has seriously endangered his re-election prospects by shouting out “you lie!” during President Obama’s speech to Congress this week.

The poll, commissioned by the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling, shows that Wilson trails his Democratic opponent Rob Miller, 44 to 43 percent. A sizable 62 percent majority of voters said they disapproved of Wilson’s actions, with only 29 percent approving.

The electorate was closely split on whether President Obama was telling the truth when he said his health care plan would not cover illegal immigrants – 46 percent said he was telling the truth, while 42 percent said they thought the president was lying.

“In a matter of seconds Joe Wilson turned himself from a safe incumbent into one of the most vulnerable Republicans in the country for 2010,” PPP pollster Dean Debnam wrote.

It’s a bit premature to be writing Wilson’s political obituary yet. The congressman won the district with 54 percent of the vote last year, a number depressed by the record level of African-American turnout in a presidential election. And it would be useful to see additional polling in the district before drawing any firm conclusions.

But one thing’s for sure, Miller has raised close to $800,000 since Wilson’s outburst and he’ll have plenty of cash to spend against him during crunch time. That fact alone makes it likely the race will be competitive, and guarantees we’ll be hearing more about Joe Wilson in the months to come.
Link to the Original Politico Story

Link to Donate to Combat Veteran and Marine Corps Officer Rob Millers Campaign and Defeat Joe Wilson

Link to The Official Rob Miller for Congress Website

Link to Write an E-Mail to “Wrong Way” Joe Wilson and Let Him Know How You Feel

Its May 1st, 2009 and Convicted Felon and Anti Obama Crook Larry Sinclair Has Not Delivered the Books Sold On His Website.

As predicted, convicted felon Larry Sinclair has not delivered the book of lies about President Obama he promised by the end of April. Larry claims he performed sexual acts on President Obama and snorted coke. He failed a polygraph test on the subject and has no witness’s, phone records or credit card receipts that back up his claims. People have been ordering a book about the subject promised by Larry for months. Larry has been taking the money and has not delivered the merchandise as promised. Every week or so Larry has made a excuse ranging from brain tumors, and toothaches to various Obama conspiracies. Larry is now saying the book will not be available until June 1st. But I know it won’t be and he will still be taking orders. Where is all the money he took for the books he didn’t deliver ?

More Information About Larry Sinclair
Link to the post about Larry not delivering the book last month

Larry Sinclair’s New Post is Hilarious

I saw this new post on youtube featuring Larry Sinclair. Hilarious

Larry Sinclair Support Dwindles: “Blockbuster” Book NOT Published

It looks like time is running out on Larry Sinclair’s 15 minutes of fame. Months of promising a book about his alleged sexual conduct and drug use with President Obama have not materialized. I have been tracking the progress of this alleged book for several months now and am personally convinced that Larry Sinclair has no book to offer. Mr. Sinclair has offered a multitude of reasons why the book was not actually published and available on many dates. These reasons usually involve an illness or some strange conspiracy theory. Larry Sinclair’s felonious past and history of fraud not withstanding I would have to guess that this was a way for Mr. Sinclair to gain attention or possibly bilk people out of money. He actually offered 200 special edition, signed copies of the book months ago and has been taking advanced orders through his website for some time. The sad thing is that he has never published the book. It also seems even close friends like blogger Citizen Wells are trying to distance themselves from him. It looks like Mr. Sinclair may be in some hot water.

An Article on Larry Sinclair’s Extensive Criminal History

Citizen Wells Friend and Anti Obama Felon Larry Sinclair gets OWNED by Opie and Anthonny

I found this interveiw between Citizen Wells friend Anti Obama Felon Larry Sinclair and radio hosts Opie and Anthony on Youtube. WARNING: Very Graphic Language

Opie and Anthonny : Larry Sinclair Interview Part 1

Opie and Anthonny : Larry Sinclair Interview Part 2

Opie and Anthonny : Larry Sinclair Interview Part 3

Enjoy

As Predicted, Larry Sinclair’s Book Was NOT Available On April 1st

As predicted  Larry Sinclair’s blockbuster book about President Obama is NOT available on April 1st, . This is no surprise. Convicted Felon Larry Sinclair seems to have a problem keeping his promises. At this point I doubt a book even exists. I think it may well worth investigating what has been done with the money Larry Sinclair has been taking for advance orders over the past MONTHS

Some background Information on Mr. Larry Sinclair.

The Barnes and Noble page with Book info and a NEW release date that is NOT April 1st.

Hate Groups Will Be Gathering at State Capitol, Raleigh, NC Saturday, March 21, 2009

White Supremisist, Militia Groups, Traitors and other Conservatives will be gathering in Raleigh, NC at the east side of the Capitol Building on Saturday March 21, 2009. They call it the New American Tea Party but it really just a cover for people that hate the United States governemnt and especially President Obama. These people say they support the Constitution, but they don’t support the electorial process and our current form of government. If they can’t have it they’re way they would rather destroy America and start a violent revolution. The people have spoken and these losers just don’t get it. North Carolina used to be a stronghold of redneck conservatives but the Democrats swept the elections in 2008 and even voted Obama in the Presidential election. If you want some Jerry Springer style entertainment I suggest you attend and bring some adult diapers and baby wipes to hand out to these whiners. God Bless President Obama and the United States of America.

Philip Berg Loses ANOTHER Frivolous Case Against President Obama: Hollister v. Soetoro DEAD

The Hollister v. Soetoro case is DEAD and Philip Berg is in over his head. In the scheme, Berg found a retired Air Force Officer to claim that some day he might be called to duty again. Said officer goes on to say if he was called to duty he wouldn’t be sure if he could serve because he wasn’t positive that President Obama was a natural born citizen and on and on. Judge Robertson saw right through it and wasn’t buying Berg’s BS. This seems to happen to Berg everytime he has to do his job as a lawyer. He seems to be good at filing frivilous cases and raising money on his website but when it comes to the actual day in court, Berg has nothing. But I guess there are enough dumb people to support the lame causes he says he can win.

Looks like its time for Mr. Berg to pay the fiddler. Federal Judge James Robertson called the case “frivolous” , “Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm”, and seemed to direct quite a bit of anger towards Philip Berg. Judge Robertson was very upset by the way Berg has possibly hurt the legal system by filing spurious lawsuits like these. The two documents below are definitely worth a read :

—————————————————————————————————————

March 5th, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY SOETORO, et al.,
Defendants.
:::::::::
Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)

ORDER
Plaintiff’s motion to file interpleader and deposit
funds with the court [#2] is frivolous and is denied. His motion
to shorten time for defendants to respond to his complaint [#3]
is moot and is denied. The motions of his counsel [#4, #5] for
the admission pro hac vice of Philip J. Berg and Lawrence J.
Joyce are in abeyance until the Court has had the opportunity, in
open court, to examine their credentials, their competence, their
good faith, and the factual and legal bases of the complaint they
have signed.

JAMES ROBERTSON
United States District Judge

————————————————————————————————

March 5th, 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY SOETORO, et al.,
Defendants.
:::::::::
Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)
MEMORANDUM
This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve
mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is
foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to
do. Even in its relatively short life the case has excited the
blogosphere and the conspiracy theorists. The right thing to do
is to bring it to an early end.
The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force
colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief
(because he might possibly be recalled to duty) and who is
tortured by uncertainty as to whether he would have to obey
orders from Barack Obama because it has not been proven — to the
colonel’s satisfaction — that Mr. Obama is a native-born
American citizen, qualified under the Constitution to be
President. The issue of the President’s citizenship was raised,
vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by
America’s vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama’s two-year-campaign
for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a
court.
The real plaintiff is probably Philip J. Berg, a lawyer
who lives in Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, and who has pursued
his crusade elsewhere, see Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509
(E.D. Pa. 2008), invoking the civil rights statutes, the Federal
Election Campaign Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the
Immigration and Nationality Act, and the law of promissory
estoppel. That case was the subject of a scholarly opinion by a
judge who took Mr. Berg’s claims seriously –- and dismissed them.
Mr. Hollister is apparently Mr. Berg’s fallback brainstorm,
essentially a straw plaintiff, one who could tee Mr. Berg’s
native-born issue up for decision on a new theory: If some
“value” could be assigned to the “duties” the plaintiff thinks he
might someday be called upon to fulfill under the Commander-in-
Chief, then those “duties” could be deposited in the registry of
this Court as the res whose distribution is to be decided by a
suit in interpleader!
The filing and service of the complaint required
private counsel to appear for President Obama and for Vice
President Biden (whose citizenship is not challenged but who was
presumably considered a necessary party in a suit seeking to
unseat the President). Those counsel have moved to dismiss,
asserting both that this Court has no jurisdiction (Rule
12(b)(1)) and that the plaintiff has stated a claim for which
relief cannot be granted (Rule 12(b)(6)).
Plaintiff having invoked both diversity and the federal
interpleader statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1355, I do have jurisdiction.
Because plaintiff’s only claim invokes the interpleader statute,
however, the suit must be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
I have already called the interpleader claim
“frivolous” in two interlocutory rulings [#10 and #14], and I do
so again here. As the defendants noted in their motion to
dismiss, “interpleader allows a party exposed to multiple claims
on a single obligation or property to settle the controversy and
satisfy his obligation in one proceeding.” Commercial Union Ins.
Co. v. U.S., 999 F.2d 581, 583 (D.C. Cir. 1993). It is typically
used in insurance cases where the plaintiff holds property on
behalf of another but does not know to whom among several adverse
parties the property should be transferred [#9 at 8]. Resort to
interpleader is inappropriate when it “is sought for improper or
ulterior purposes.” Wright & Miller § 1707 (3d ed. 2001).
Plaintiff has not cited a single case that lends even
colorable support to the notion that his alleged “duties” can be
the “money or property” to which the interpleader statute
applies. The interpleader suits he cites are all about money or
tangible property: American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v.
Construcciones Werl, Inc., 407 F. Supp 164 (D. V.I. 1975) is
about contested HUD monies; Underwriters at Lloyd’s v. Nichols,
363 F.2d 357 (8th Cir. 1966), is about insurance proceeds; Dunbar
v. United States, 502 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1974) is about money
seized from the mails. The only interpleader case plaintiff
cites that involves a “duty” is Bank of Neosho v. Colcord, 8
F.R.D. 621 (W.D. Mo. 1949) (Complaint, para. 12), an inapposite
decision declining to strike a cross-claim for specific
performance in an interpleader case that began, as interpleader
cases do, with the deposit of funds. This suit will accordingly
be dismissed.
Mr. Berg and Lawrence J. Joyce, an attorney who lives
in Tucson, Arizona, signed the complaint in this case. (They
have been filing electronically although they have not been
admitted pro hac vice, see [#10].) They are agents
provocateurs –- and any attempt to sanction them for misuse of
the public and private resources that have had to be devoted to
this case would only give them a forum to continue their
provocation. John D. Hemenway, on the other hand, is a member of
the Bar of this Court. He may have been enlisted by Messrs. Berg
and Joyce as a foot soldier in their crusade, but he is
nevertheless directly responsible to this Court for the pleadings
that have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Because it
appears that the complaint in this case may have been presented
for an improper purpose such as to harass; and that the
interpleader claims and other legal contentions of plaintiff are
not warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous arguments for
extending, modifying or reversing existing law or for
establishing new law, the accompanying order of dismissal
requires Mr. Hemenway to show cause why he has not violated Rules
11(b)(1) and 11(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
and why he should not be required to pay reasonable attorneys
fees and other expenses to counsel for the defendants.
JAMES ROBERTSON
United States District Judge

Some Interesting Information About Obama Accuser and Citizen Wells Friend Larry Sinclair

Larry Sinclair is a regular poster on Citizen Wells blog. Citizen Wells has even met personally with Larry Sinclair. Who is this mysterious friend of Citizen Wells ? Well first off Larry Sinclair has claimed he provided oral sex to Barack Obama. He also claimed he did Cocaine with Barack Obama. Since Citizen Wells claims to be all about truth and justice I thought I might just post some things I found out  his close friend and associate he has failed to mention to his readers.

Here is what conservatives have to say about Larry Sinclair:

“Initially, we gave Sinclair and his claims a fair hearing. But, when someone brings serious accusations against a presidential candidate–and we can muster little enthusiasm for any of Obama’s stands on the issues–the burden of proof falls on the accuser. Sinclair, 4 months and counting after since the release of his YouTube video detailing his initial accusations, has come up empty in the Proof Department.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL STORY ON THE CONSERVATIVE SITE

HERE IS A NICE STORY ABOUT LARRY’S EXTENSIVE CRIMINAL HISTORY

HERE IS A PDF OF SOME OF HIS ACTUAL CRIMINAL RECORDS

HERE IS A NICE STORY ABOUT LARRY FAILING A POLYGRAPH TEST ABOUT THE AFFAIR

HERE IS 184 PDF PAGES OF LARRY SINCLAIR INFO

Please feel free to post your thoughts on this Blog.