Philip J. Berg The Lawyer: His Conspiracy Theories About Obama, Bush, The 911 Attack, And His Website Asking for Money to Support Him

Philip Berg the Lawyer has filed claims in our court system that President Obama is not qualified to be our President. Mr. Bergs claims have been thrown out of court one by one. This doesn’t seem to bother Mr. Berg. Philip Berg is still asking for money from people to support his spurious claims. I find it alarming that Mr. Berg is able to file lawsuits that contain no evidence other than hearsay. It seems like a blatant attempt to make more claims and attempt to collect more money. It seems to me that Mr. Berg is taking advantage of our legal system by filing useless lawsuits and wasting the taxpayers time and money to answer these ridiculous lawsuits. Also alarming is that I couldn’t find any documents on Mr. Berg’s website Obamacrimes.com showing when and why his cases were thrown out. Here is an important one I found myself at the US Supreme Court Website.

No. 08-570
Title:	Philip J. Berg, Petitioner v. Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:	October 31, 2008
Lower Ct:	United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Nos.:	(08-4340)
	Rule 11

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008	Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008	Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008	Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008	Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008	Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008	Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008	Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008	Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008	Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.
Dec 17 2008	Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008	Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008	Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
Jan 12 2009	Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED.
Jan 12 2009	Petition DENIED.
Jan 21 2009	Application (08A505) denied by the Court.

Philip Berg the Lawyer seems to have a history of making strange claims.  In 2007 Philip Berg filed a RICO suit against President Bush and Dick Cheney claiming they were the architects of the 911 attack on the World Trade Center and asked that they both be arrested and tried for global crimes and punished accordingly. He also claimed that the 911 attacks were a plan for global dominance and even claimed President Bush’s brother Jeb was involved according to thus story posted on RINF.COM.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO STORY ON RINF.COM

When you look into Philip Berg’s past there are things that make you pause for a moment. I found a story about Berg being slapped with $10,000 in sanctions and ordered to complete 6 hours of ethics training. A couple quotes from the 10 page finding against Attorney Berg Jump right out at you when you look at some of the cases Mr. Berg has filed.  US District Judge J. Curtis Joyner had these things to say according to the story posted on Law.com:

“Other attorneys should look to Mr. Berg’s actions as a blueprint for what not to do when attempting to effectively and honorably perform the duties of the legal profession,”

Joyner blasted Berg for filing the fraud claim, calling it an “irresponsible decision” because the claim was “utterly barren of any scintilla of legal principles.”

Berg had no standing to bring suit against Carpenters Health and had “failed to conduct even a minimally reasonable inquiry before filing his complaint.”

“filing a complaint completely devoid of any basis in fact or law, as would be apparent to any reasonable attorney after the slightest inquiry.”

CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE LAW.COM STORY

CLICK HERE TO GO TO HOLSWORTH V. PHILIP J. BERG, ESQ

CLICK HERE TO GO A LINK TO BERG’S WEBSITE SAYING THERE IS AN URGENT NEED FOR MONEY

Some Court Documents You May Have Trouble Finding On Anti Barack Obama Attorney, 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist, Bush Rico and Proponent of Disbarring Members of the Supreme Court Philip J Berg’s Website

Document 1
No. 08-570
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)
Rule 11

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by respondent Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) DENIED by Justice Souter.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.

Lawrence J. Joyce Lawrence J. Joyce LLC (520) 584-0236
1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215
Tucson, AZ 85712
barmemberlj@earthlink.net
Party name: Bill Anderson
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
——————————————————————————————————-
Document 2
No. 08A391
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) DENIED by Justice Souter.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a391.htm
—————————————————————————————————
Document 3
No. 08A505
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Applicant
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (08-4340)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) DENIED by Justice Souter.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.

Lawrence J. Joyce Lawrence J. Joyce LLC (520) 584-0236
1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215
Tucson, AZ 85712
Party name: Bill Anderson
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a505.htm
Link to US Supreme Court

Document 4
Obama Campaigns answer when he tried to shut down the November 4th election

Who is Anti Barack Obama Attorney Philip J. Berg ? Parts 1 and 2 , His 9/11 Conspiracy Theories, Bush Rico Lawsuits, Disbarring the Supreme Court aka Spurious Legal Cases

Here is an interesting history of some of Philip J. Berg’s politically driven spurious lawsuits.

Here’s more about Berg:

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 01/04/07) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire,
[Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania; former
candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate; an attorney with offices in
Montgomery County, PA and an active practice in Philadelphia, PA, who
prior hereto has filed a RICO lawsuit against Bush and others for the
events of 9/11 and plans to re-file shortly] announced today that he
was issuing a call for world leaders to arrest and try Bush and Cheney
for the global crimes of 9/11/01.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in a letter to the nations throughout
the world:

“It is time for the nations of the world to come forth and take the
leadership because of the failure of the United States Government and
the States where crimes were committed on 09/11/01, where no thorough
investigation and indictments occurred, to investigate, arrest and
prosecute the people responsible for the murders on 9/11/01,
specifically including George W. Bush and Richard Cheney.”

Berg sounds quite confident there, but when it comes to specifics, he
vacillates a bit:

Berg continued there is overwhelming evidence that:

“Bush and his cronies made 9/11 happen or let it happen. And, if they
let it happen, then they made it happen. Either way, they are
responsible; and more important, they have completely and
unequivocally covered-it-up!”

Berg continues:

” Now, it is time for world leaders to take the lesson learned from
Iraq and issue a warrant for the arrest of George W. Bush and Richard
Cheney; arrest them; take them to a neutral country; try them for the
murder of over 2,800 people from more than 80 countries on 9/11/01
and, when found guilty, sentence them appropriately. Jurisdiction
would be proper in any of the more than 80 countries whose citizens
were murdered on 9/11. “

Yeah, just arrest them!

Berg’s a nutbar Bush-hater from way back; in 2001 he asked Supreme
Court Justices Thomas, Scalia and O’Connor to voluntarily disbar
themselves for their decision in Bush v. Gore. He also sued President
Bush in 2004 under a RICO lawsuit on behalf of Willie Rodriguez.

Berg is the nutball attorney who sued President-elect Obama, claiming
that Obama was sired by the great racehorse Secretariat and a
Norwegian mare. Here’s more about Berg:

http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/philip-berg-seeking-the-truth-of-911

Philip J. Berg, Esq. Seeking the “Truth of 9/11″
Calls on World Community To Arrest and Try Bush & Cheney for Global
Crimes of 9/11
Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Philip J. Berg, Esquire, [Berg is a former Deputy Attorney General of
Pennsylvania; former candidate for Governor and U.S. Senate; an
attorney with offices in Montgomery County, PA and an active practice
in Philadelphia, PA, who prior hereto has filed a RICO lawsuit against
Bush and others for the events of 9/11 and plans to re-file shortly]
announced today that he was issuing a call for world leaders to arrest
and try Bush and Cheney for the global crimes of 9/11/01.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in a letter to the nations throughout
the world:

“It is time for the nations of the world to come forth and take the
leadership because of the failure of the United States Government and
the States where crimes were committed on 09/11/01, where no thorough
investigation and indictments occurred, to investigate, arrest and
prosecute the people responsible for the murders on 9/11/01,
specifically including George W. Bush and Richard Cheney. ”

Berg continued there is overwhelming evidence that:

“Bush and his cronies made 9/11 happen or let it happen. And, if they
let it happen, then they made it happen. Either way, they are
responsible; and more important, they have completely and
unequivocally covered-it-up!”

Berg’s letter went on to say:

“The trial and execution of Saddam Hussein marks the “end of a
difficult year for the Iraqi people and for our troops” according to
President Bush.

Now, it is time for world leaders to take the lesson learned from Iraq
and issue a warrant for the arrest of George W. Bush and Richard
Cheney; arrest them; take them to a neutral country; try them for the
murder of over 2,800 people from more than 80 countries on 9/11/01
and, when found guilty, sentence them appropriately. Jurisdiction
would be proper in any of the more than 80 countries whose citizens
were murdered on 9/11.

Despite a near-complete corporate media embargo on the wealth of
evidence indicating that the 9/11 attacks were caused or knowingly
permitted to happen by top figures in the Administration and the
military, 84 % of the U.S. public, according to an October 2006 CBS/NY
Times poll, is unconvinced by the “Official Story,” and agrees that
the President and others caused or allowed the attacks to happen.

That an event such as 9/11 was desired by powerful Administration
figures, including Cheney and Jeb Bush, the President’s brother, is a
matter of record, as the Project for the New American Century’s [PNAC]
blueprint for worldwide U.S. dominance entitled “Rebuilding America’s
Defenses,” stated that the program they advocated could win popular
support only with the help of a “catastrophic and catalyzing event,
like a new Pearl Harbor” which (we are supposed to believe to be
coincidence) came to pass just 8 months after many of the co-signers
of the PNAC document assumed high positions in the new Bush
Administration in January 2001.

As President John F. Kennedy stated, “Things do not just happen; they
are made to happen.” There has never been an investigation of 9/11
that had not concluded, before it even began, that the Official Story
convicting Osama bin Laden and absolving the Administration and the
military of complicity of anything worse than “intelligence failures,”
which thereby made the outcome a foregone conclusion.

It is time that the men who had the motive, means and the opportunity
to commit the terrible crimes of 9/11, and who have profited by it
politically as well as financially, be exposed for their role and held
to account.

The world has suffered since the horrific acts of Bush and his cronies
on 9/11, that being the events of 9/11 and the aftermath, the illegal
act of war against Afghanistan and Iraq that has caused the death and
injury of hundreds of thousands, including thousands of U.S. troops;
the destruction of property and the enormous costs involved.

Saddam was tried, found guilty and sentenced to death after being
convicted of murder in the killings of 148 Shiite Muslims from an
Iraqi town where assassins tried to kill him in 1982. This number of
killings that Saddam Hussein was found guilty of is far less than Bush
and his cronies caused to die on 9/11.

The 148 Iraqi deaths for which Saddam was tried pales in number to the
750,000 dead at the hands of George W. Bush as a result of this
illegal invasion of that country which includes babies, sons,
daughters, mothers, fathers, elderly grandmothers and grandfathers,
killed without remorse by George W. Bush and his war profiteering
supporters.

Bush continues the war in Iraq to keep the world’s attention there and
not on the atrocities caused by him on 9/11, including the possibility
of Bush sending up to 40,000 more troops to Iraq, even though a
majority of the American people are against this increase.

The world must act now because our own government has failed us. We
cannot relent until real justice is reached. Only by exposing the
truth of 9/11 and revealing how it was used as the “trigger event” to
justify the neocon’s imperial policy can we put these events in proper
prospective.”

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.politics/2008-11/msg01915.html
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.politics/2008-11/msg01914.html

Anti Barack Obama attorney Philip J. Berg faces disciplinary complaint

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

INTERNET POWERHOUSE ANDY MARTIN ASKS PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY BOARD TO EXAMINE ATTORNEY PHILIP BERG’S PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

(NEW YORK)(November 12, 2008) Andy Martin has asked the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board to investigate
the conduct of anti-Obama attorney Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, PA. “There have been a lot of questions, and criticism, swirling around Mr. Berg’s behavior,” Martin stated. “I thought his behavior merited a look by the Disciplinary Board. That way there can be a fair and impartial examination of his claims and actions.”

A copy of Martin’s Statement, which is part of Martin’s form complaint, (faxed to the DB today, November 12th) follows:

November 12, 2008

Philip J. Berg contacted me in mid-August about a complaint he proposed to file in federal court. He sent me the complaint to review, and I advised him the complaint was nonsense. He was suing the wrong parties in the wrong court for the wrong relief. Berg said he wanted to “enjoin the Democratic National Convention,” which caused me to question his sanity. He pleaded that Barack Obama was “born in Kenya” when there is not a shred of credible evidence to support this claim.

He filed his complaint and then began issuing a series of asinine news releases about the progress of his lawsuit.

Berg is playing on the vulnerability of people who intensely dislike President-elect Barack Obama, and using his inflated accusations to solicit money from the public. He constantly exaggerates or misrepresents the facts. In early September persons acting on his behalf claimed there was a “court order” for Obama to produce a birth certificate. No such order existed.

Then he claimed Obama was in “default” and had “admitted” he was born in Kenya. This was compete nonsense. As someone who is a genuine critic of Mr. Obama, I know firsthand what confusion Berg creates with his false and misleading claims. Most recently he or persons acting in concert with him have suggested that the U.S. Supreme Court “ordered” a response to his nonsense. The Court has done nothing of the sort. The court’s rules simply provide a thirty-day period for responses.

I don’t know whether Berg suffers from an emotional disturbance, or is merely a money-grubbing huckster, or what, but Berg’s behavior is undermining public faith in the integrity of the Pennsylvania legal profession.

Berg has been disciplined in the past for misconduct:

systocracy.com/Bergmalpracticetwo
www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/05D0679P.pdf
www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/05d0521p.pdf

Lawyers are entitled to engage in vigorous advocacy. They are encouraged to extend and revise legal precedents. But they are not entitled to file delusional claims without a scintilla of support, particularly when they then use these delusional claims as a basis to solicit money from the public.

Mr. Berg has previously claimed that the U.S. Government blew up the World Trade Center, again without shred of evidence to support his nonsense.

He is a threat to vulnerable citizens who tend to believe his false claims and give him money on the false assumption that Berg is acting in good faith. By stealing small amounts of money from people across the nation he has flown under the radar of professional discipline. No competent attorney could have acted as Berg did during the past three months. His behavior in federal court, all of which is a public record, is outrageous.
-
A copy of Martin’s complaint is available by fax (not e-mail)
-
Andy Martin is a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of broadcasting experience in radio and television. He is currently based in New York selling his new book, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of http://www.ContrarianCommentary.com. © Copyright by Andy Martin 2008. Martin comments on regional, national and world events with over forty years of experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree
from the University of Illinois College of Law.

His columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Andy is the author of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, published in July 2008, see http://www.OrangeStatePress.com.

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329
E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com [NOTE: We frequently correct typographical errors and additions/subtractions on our blogs, where you can find the latest edition of this release.]

US Supreme Court Dismisses Barack Obama Birth Certificate Case

In a move that will upset conspiracy theorists, UFO proponents, and racists throughout the country, the US Supreme Court has dismissed the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Case. This case was brought as an emergency by a crackpot from New Jersey who was trying to make the case that because Barack Obama’s Father was a British Citizen, Barack wasn’t a “Natural Born Citizen”. There was no definition given for a natural born citizen in the US Constitution. So in 1795, that’s right 1795 our forefathers decided they would clear this up and passed the Naturalization Act of 1975. Many of the forefathers that were at the Constitution Convention were involved in the crafting and the passing of this legislation of Title 8 of the U.S. Code filling in the gaps of US Citizenship. Its sad that a politically motivated case like this can actually be brought to our court system but it proves the court is accessible to everybody, even wackos. So for future reference, this is who qualities as a citizen:

Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?

The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps.

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”

* Anyone born inside the United States
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.

Information on Citizenship
Chicago Tribune story on the Obama Birth Certificate Case